The more other people do the same, the less the issue of plagiarism will matter. For what it’s worth, I now support a number of titles and individual journalists in precisely this way, because I enjoy their work and wish to see it flourish. This is becoming an increasingly popular approach. Make a gift today in support of our work. On the issue of drawing support from fans, it’s interesting to note that the Vox article mentioned at the start of this post has the following banner at the top of the page:įinancial support from our readers helps keep our unique explanatory journalism free. Better acknowledgement by those who use his work would always be welcome. That’s something that most people are willing to add, as his Twitter thread indicates, because it’s clearly the right thing to do. It would certainly help to boost his circle of supporters if everyone that draws on his work gives attribution. One alternative is the “ true fans” model, whereby the people who have enjoyed your past work become patrons who sponsor future work, because they want more of it.įor someone like Koerner, with a proven track record of good writing, and presumably many thousands of fans, this might be an option. The key question is then: how can journalists – and indeed all artists – earn more from their work? The current structures based around copyright really don’t work well, as previous posts on Walled Culture have explored. In general, journalists aren’t paid enough for the work they do (although, as a journalist, I may be biased). If Koerner wasn’t paid a fair price, for whatever reason, that’s more of an issue. In a way, those pale imitations serve to validate the superior original. ![]() It’s true that others may be freeriding off his work, but in doing so, it’s unlikely they will improve on his original article. Things like: did Koerner get paid a fair price by The Atlantic for all his work? If he did, then the issue of re-use matters less. I think there are more interesting questions here than what exactly is plagiarism, which arises from copyright’s obsessions with ownership. Multiple verbatim extracts is a more complex situation, and might require a court case to decide whether under current copyright law it’s allowed. If it means taking the information of Koerner’s article and repackaging it, well, you can’t copyright facts. I’ve not listened to the podcast (life is too short), so I can’t comment on what exactly “based exclusively on” means in this context. “Situations like this have become all too common amid the podcast boom,” he wrote in a now-viral Twitter thread last month. Someone published a podcast based exclusively on a story ’d spent nine years reporting for The Atlantic, with zero credit or acknowledgment of the source material. It concerns a long and interesting story he wrote for The Atlantic last year. Koerner, contributing editor at Wired and author of several books, also mentioned in the Vox article. More interesting than the TikTok advice is the example of Brendan I. However unfair that might seem to the person or company that came up with the idea in the first place, it’s really only survival of the fittest, where fit means popular. If they offer something more than the original – extra features, a new twist – they might even be more successful. As soon as a new product or new category comes along that is highly successful, other companies pile in with their own variants, which may be quite close to the original. Following a trend is universal, not just online, but in the analogue world too, for example in business. ![]() ![]() If it’s not “literally” copying it, then it’s more a matter of following a trend than plagiarism, which involves taking someone else’s work and passing it off as your own. ![]() You don’t need to copy it completely, but you can get pretty close. Its starting point is a post on TikTok, entitled “How to EASILY Produce Video Ideas for TikTok.” It gives the following advice:įind somebody else’s TikTok that inspires you and then literally copy it. There’s a fascinating article by Rebecca Jennings on Vox which explores the vexed question of plagiarism.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |